UC San Diego: Sugar-coating disguise allows for coronavirus infection
by Jorge Salazar and Cynthia Dillon
Published - 07/04/20 - 08:00 AM | 7872 views | 1 1 comments | 73 73 recommendations | email to a friend | print
UC San Diego professor of chemistry and biochemistry Rommie Amaro.
UC San Diego professor of chemistry and biochemistry Rommie Amaro.

According to Mary Poppins, a spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down. In the case of coronavirus, a cloak of sugar helps the virus infect. This sugary-coating disguise, made of molecules called glycans, tricks the human immune system into identifying the microbe as harmless. The resulting recognition failure keeps the body from generating the defensive antibodies needed to destroy the invading coronavirus.

Using the National Science Foundation-funded Frontera supercomputer at the Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC), professor of chemistry and biochemistry Rommie Amaro — along with her UC San Diego colleagues and researchers from Maynooth University in Dublin, Ireland, led by Elisa Fadda — has uncovered the atomic makeup of the coronavirus's sugary cloak. The simulation and modeling reveal that glycans also prime the coronavirus for infection by changing the shape of its spike protein. Scientists hope this basic research will add to the arsenal of knowledge needed to defeat the COVID-19 virus.


“The more we know about it, the more of its abilities that we're going to be able to go after and potentially take out,” Amaro said. “It is of such great importance that we learn as much as we can about the virus. And then hopefully we can translate those understandings into things that will be useful either in the clinic or the streets; for example, if we're trying to reduce transmission for what we know now about aerosols and wearing masks. All these things will be part of it. Basic research has a huge role to play in the war against COVID-19. And I'm happy to be a part of it. It's a strength that we have Frontera and TACC in our arsenal.”


Glycans coat each of the 65-odd spike proteins that adorn the coronavirus. The sugar-like molecules account for about 40 percent of the spike protein by weight. The spike proteins are critical to cell infection because they lock onto the cell surface, giving the virus entry into the cell.


Amaro, along with her UC San Diego colleagues Lorenzo Casalino, Zied Gaieb, Abigail Dommer, Emilia Barros and Bryn Taylor, explained that even to make an initial connection, one of the pieces of the spike protein in its receptor binding domain has to lift up. It is one of the things Frontera — part of the COVID-19 HPC Consortium along with San Diego Supercomputer Center at UC San Diego — helped reveal: that in the open conformation, there are two glycans that basically prop up the spike protein.


“That was really surprising to see. It's one of the major results of our study. It suggests that the role of glycans in this case is going beyond shielding to potentially having these chemical groups actually being involved in the dynamics of the spike protein,” said Amaro, a corresponding author of the study published online June 12, by bioRxiv,org, a preprint repository.


“When that receptor binding domain lifts up into the open conformation, it actually lifts the important bits of the protein up over the glycan shield,” Amaro said, adding that this contrasts with the closed conformation, where the shield covers the spike protein. “Our analysis gives a potential reason why it does have to undergo these conformational changes, because if it just stays in the down position those glycans are basically going to block the binding from actually happening,” she said, adding that the shifts in the conformations of the glycans triggered changes in the spike protein structure.


Amaro compared the action of the glycan to pulling the trigger of a gun. “When that bit of the spike goes up, the finger is on the trigger of the infection machinery. That's when it's in its most dangerous mode — it is locked and loaded,” Amaro said. “When it gets like that, all it has to do is come up against an ACE2 receptor in the human cell, and then it's going to bind super tightly and the cell is basically infected.”


The research team used computational methods to build data-centric models of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and then used computer simulations to explore different scientific questions about the virus. They started with various experimental datasets that revealed the structure of the virus. This included cryo-EM structures from the Jason McLellan Lab of The University of Texas at Austin; and from the lab of David Veesler at the University of Washington.


“Their structures are really amazing because they give researchers a picture of what these important molecular machines actually look like,” Amaro said.


Unfortunately, even the most powerful microscopes on Earth still can't resolve movement of the protein at the atomic scale.


“What we do with computers is that we take the beautiful and wonderful and important data that they give us, but then we use methods to build in missing bits of information,” Amaro said. “What people really want to know — for example, vaccine and drug developers — are the vulnerabilities that are present in this shield.”


The computer simulations allowed Amaro and colleagues to create a cohesive picture of the spike protein that includes the glycans.


“The reason why the computer resources at TACC are so important is that we can't understand what these glycans look like if we don't use simulation,” Amaro said.

In order to animate the dynamics of the 1.7 million atom system under study, a lot of computing power was needed, said Amaro.


“That's really where Frontera has been fantastic, because we need to sample relatively long dynamics, microsecond to millisecond timescales, to understand how this protein is actually working. We've been able to do that with Frontera and the COVID-19 HPC Consortium,” Amaro said. “Now we're trying to share our data with as many people as we can, because people want a dynamical understanding of what's happening — not only with other academic groups, but also with different pharmaceutical and biotech companies that are conducting neutralizing antibody development,” she said, adding that basic research is making a difference in winning the war against the SARS-Co-V-2 virus.


This research was supported by NIH, NSF, an award from the RCSA Research Corp., a UC San Diego Moore's Cancer Center 2020 SARS-COV-2 seed grant, the Visible Molecular Cell Consortium and the Irish Research Council.

Comments-icon Post a Comment
Fritz Louderback
July 04, 2020
I am just a layman, permit me to extrapolate from the information this article provides: (1) for some of us there is something in our body that does not permit the Corona Virus' spikes to protrude; (2) without protruding spikes the virus is within our body, but the virus is not able to latch on to our cells, multiply, and make us sick (3) as long as the virus is in our body, even without protruding spikes, we are potential carriers of the disease, and a danger to others, especially those without whatever is contained in our bodies that keeps the spikes from protruding (4) which brings up the question of how long can the virus exist in one's immune body before it dies off and can no longer infect another human? ASSUMPTION: a vaccine that converts a person's body into an immune body in that the newly vaccine treated body will not permit the virus' spikes to protrude will need a period of time before they no longer become a carrier of the virus, and are no longer a danger to others. Since we have now, a ten minute, at most, finger prick blood test we can separate those who carry the non-protruding spike carriers, from those that have protruding spikes, but have not yet shown the characteristics of the inevitable illness. The test will also show those of us who have never come in contact with the virus and are neither spike or non-spike virus carriers, which raises a question about anti-spike vaccines: "if I am not a spike or non-spike virus carrier, and I receive the anti-spike vaccine, does that now make me immune to the effects of the virus (illness), but now a potential carrier, and a danger to others? If so, this brings up the need for constant testing. Especially with the potential of school openings parents need a home-virus-test-kit, not only to test themselves, but to test their children, the whole household on a regular basis. The less invasive the test, the better. Nose swabs suck, the finger blood test is OK with me, but my pre-K, and lower grade school grand kids, I think will be happier with a saliva test. SOMEONE PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG. [email protected]
Comments are back! Simply post the comment (it'll complain about you failing the human test) then simply click on the captcha and then click "Post Comment" again. Comments are also welcome on our Facebook page.